Tennis desk

Tennis reporting built on return-of-serve and break-point data

Slams, ATP and WTA tour reporting with the return-of-serve charts, break-point conversion rates and the tactical reads our desk files through every tournament.

Tonight’s slate

What the tennis desk is following

Kick-off (IST)TournamentRoundCoverage
21:00 ISTWTA FinalsSemifinalFollow →
02:30 ISTATP MastersQuarterfinalFollow →
04:00 ISTDoublesSemifinalFollow →
Tennis backhand at the baseline
The two-handed backhand is where most baseline matches are actually won or lost.
How we cover tennis

Three reads per match, three reads per tournament

For every match, our desk files a return-of-serve read, a break-point conversion read and a tactical note on the patterns the players are trying to dictate.

For tournaments, we add a draw-read piece after the bracket is set and a final preview that names the two players we think the conditions favour.

Read the methodology
Latest reporting

Filed in the last 24 hours

WTAFiled 02:14 IST

WTA finals: a return-of-serve pattern worth tracking into the semis

Read the report
ATPFiled yesterday

The first-serve percentage that flipped the quarterfinal

Read the report
Draw readFiled yesterday

Why the top half of the ATP draw favours the bigger server

Read the report
Return-of-serve reading

What the return-of-serve chart tells you

For tennis, the return-of-serve chart is the most predictive single tool for reading a match before it starts. Our desk publishes return-of-serve charts for every ranked player in the WTA and ATP top 100.

Return points won

The percentage of return points won. The WTA average sits at 45%; top returners run at 52-55%.

Break-point conversion

The percentage of break points converted. Break-point conversion is more variable than return points won, and is more sensitive to the day’s serving form.

First-serve return depth

Where on the service box the return lands. Deeper returns pressure the server’s next shot; shorter returns give the server time to set up.

Draw reading

What the tournament draw tells you

The top half

Top-half draws often favour the bigger server or the player with the more reliable first serve. We name which player the conditions favour.

The bottom half

Bottom-half draws often favour the returner or the player who can extend rallies. The trade-off between first-serve percentage and return depth is the headline.

The path through

Our final preview names the two players we think the conditions favour, the path each would need to take through the draw, and the one matchup that decides the tournament.

The tennis desk

What we cover through the season

Our tennis desk covers the WTA and ATP tours, with depth on the four Slams and the late-season WTA Finals and ATP Finals. The coverage rhythm is built around the tournament calendar.

Match reports

A match report for every WTA and ATP match on the desk. Score, return-of-serve read, break-point conversion, tactical pattern.

Draw reads

A draw-read piece after every Slam bracket is set. The piece names the two players the conditions favour.

Final previews

A final preview that names the two or three tactical questions that will decide the match.

The tactical vocabulary

Five terms our tennis desk uses

Return of serve

The most predictive single tool for reading a tennis match. Return of serve is the percentage of return points won.

Break-point conversion

The percentage of break points converted. Break-point conversion is more variable than return of serve and more sensitive to the day’s serving form.

First-serve percentage

The percentage of first serves that land in. A higher first-serve percentage typically means a higher hold rate.

Service hold

A game won by the server. The service-hold percentage is a clean measure of serving form.

Unforced error

A shot that fails to land in the court without being forced by the opponent. The unforced-error count is the cleanest measure of a player’s composure.

How we work

The editorial standards we work to

Every page on comesportsnow sits on the same five editorial principles: sourced claims, named by-lines, visible timestamps, dated corrections and disclosed conflicts. The five principles are not aspirational; they are the gate every page passes through before it goes live.

Sourced claims

Every claim that can be checked against a named source is checked. If we cannot source a claim, we do not publish it.

Named by-lines

Every by-line belongs to the reporter who filed the copy. We do not run anonymous syndication or AI-only by-lines.

Visible timestamps

Every article shows when it was filed and when it was last verified. Updates carry their own timestamps.

Dated corrections

Corrections are published within 24 hours of confirmation and recorded on the corrections log.

Disclosed conflicts

Reporters disclose any personal connection to a team, competition or story. The disclosure appears at the bottom of the article when it applies.

What sport means to us

Coverage built for readers who follow for the love of the game

Most of our readers follow the game because they care about the shape of the side, the form of the player, the captaincy call that swung a match. They do not place a wager, and they do not need a betting angle to justify their interest.

Our coverage is built for them. The desk treats live scores as the starting point, not the headline. The desk publishes the supporting and counter evidence alongside every prediction. The desk does not run odds widgets, does not take bookmaker partnerships and does not run a paid tipster subscription.

If you follow sport for the love of the game, our coverage is built for you.

Community football
Sport is what brings neighbourhoods together.
Stay close to the desk

One short email when a match turns

The alerts desk sends up to three emails per match you follow: kick-off, in-game change of state and full-time summary. No filler, no sponsored content, unsubscribe in one click.

Subscribe to match alerts

Pick the sports and competitions you follow. We don’t share or sell the address.

The Slam cycle

What we publish through a Slam

Draw read

A draw-read piece after the bracket is set. The piece names the two players the conditions favour and the path each would need to take.

Daily match reports

A match report for every match on the desk through the tournament. The report covers the score, the return-of-serve read and the tactical pattern.

Final preview

A final preview that names the two or three tactical questions that will decide the match. The preview is filed 24 hours before the final.

The WTA Finals

How we cover the year-end WTA Finals

The year-end WTA Finals is the highest-stakes tournament on the women’s calendar. Our tennis desk files a preview piece ahead of the tournament, daily reports through the round-robin, and a final preview before the championship match.

The ATP Finals follows the same coverage rhythm. The two year-end tournaments bookend the tennis calendar and frame the off-season conversation.

Editorial standards

How we sourced this story

The story was filed under the desk’s editorial standards. Every claim has been checked against a named source. The article is timestamped and will be updated as the variables change.

Primary sources

League feeds, official press releases and on-the-ground correspondents. Where attribution depends on a primary source, the source is named.

Verification

Every score, every quote and every figure has been verified against a second source before publication.

Corrections

If a claim needs to be corrected, a dated correction note is added at the top of the article and recorded on the corrections log.

What this story sits on

The reporting and the methodology

The reporting

This story sits on a combination of accredited correspondent reporting, official league data and the desk’s own statistical model. Where a claim depends on attribution, the source is named in the article. Where a claim depends on the model, the methodology is published in full.

The article is timestamped and will be updated as the variables change. The corrections log records any material change.

The methodology

The model used in the story is the desk’s standard v3, rebuilt earlier this year. The methodology is published in full on the predictions desk. Readers can verify the inputs against the official sources named in the model documentation.

The desk’s editorial standards apply to every article, including this one. The standards are published on the editorial-standards page.

Where to follow the story next

The desk’s coverage threads

Live coverage

The live desk follows the next fixture with verified scores and last-update timestamps. The live card carries the match commentary thread.

Open the live desk →

Predictions update

The predictions desk updates the call if team news, weather or lineup changes move the picture. The confidence label is updated accordingly.

Open the predictions desk →

Match alerts

The alerts desk sends up to three emails per match you follow. Kick-off, in-game change of state, full-time summary.

Subscribe to alerts →
Play now